No protected areas please, we are in the “Arab Spring”!

One of the most bizarre consequences of the impact of the “Arab Spring” in Jordan is the new threat to the concept and sustainability of protected areas and natural reserves. After the wave of public protests sweeping the region asking for better governance and enhancing public services the government of Jordan started to feel the pressure and the political-social balance in the country is about to change with more empowerment and mobilization of the people and erosion of some state authority.

Jordan has a unique biodiversity despite its relatively small size and is home to 7 jewels in the form of natural reserves that attract local and foreign sustainable tourism activities, and harbor local socio-economic development initiatives that provide income and alternative livelihoods to local communities. For more details about Jordan’s protected areas and biodiversity go to www.rscn.org.jo

Yarmouk Protected Area in the north of Jordan 

Although the expanded public space of freedom of gathering and expression has resulted in the mobilization of some genuine and effective environmental movements against the proposed nuclear programme and the destruction of Bergish forest to build a military complex, some other protests were detrimental to the environmental agenda. The public protests raised one of the most controversial and sensitive issues in Jordan which is the “historic claims to land” by local tribes that used to “manage” such lands and have historic rights prior to the establishment of the State. Many tribes and local communities requested the return of their “claimed historic rights” to lands they used to manage including some areas designated as potential Protected Areas.

This case was very obvious in Jabal Masouda (Petra) where members of local communities showed their open resistance to the establishment of the Jabal Masouda protected area by the Royal Society for the Conservation of Nature (RSCN), which is the NGO officially mandated to establish and manage protected areas. The local administration, represented by the Petra Regional Authority provided support to the claims in an attempt to keep the area within the proposed economic development plans but not as a Protected Area.  The RSCN had to find an alternative area that represents the targeted ecosystem/habitat in Jabal Masouda and found their aim in the Shobak area which is still under negotiation with the government. The same case emerged here with some local communities asking for land rights, while another main player, the National Resources Authority requesting the designation of large percentage of the area for mining purposes. Until now the designation file of Shobak is still frozen by the government with no apparent breakthrough in the deadlock.

In the Yarmouk Protected Area some local tribal figures leaders and parliamentarians asked the government to abolish its decision to establish the Protected Area, again on the basis of the historic rights to lands and to continue grazing and unplanned use of natural resources and ecosystem services. In this case RSCN took an uncompromising position to refuse any changes to the legal status and boundaries of the PA, fearing that such precedence may open up the door for more claims in other PAs.

This change in the context of political economy and power will certainly pose real challenges for RSCN and the environmental community in general to respond in an early, effective and participatory manner to the request to change the status of PAs. For any new PA as well a detailed socio-political assessment should be conducted to identify potential sources of risks and mitigate them before any area is about to be declared as protected.

One of the options that can be pursued is to conduct a detailed analysis of land tenure in any area that is considered suitable and important to have a protected area. With the current controversy over historic rights to lands by the local communities,it is vital to avoid any areas where local communities have a belief of historic rights and if such a case appears should go the extra mile in gaining the trust of local communities before engaging in the establishment of PAs. The development of sustainable socio-economic and conservation projects could be an entry point to strengthening relationships with local communities.

The RSCN and the protected areas themselves are unfortunately paying the price for the lack of trust that the local communities are showing towards the public institutions and policies. It is important that such marvelous achievements in the Jordanian environmental sector be protected from the impacts of the Arab Spring and the legacy of bad public policies.

About bwardam

Mr Batir Wardam is a Jordanian environmentalist with professional experience in disciplines of natural resource management, environmental policies and communication. He has a 15 years working experience with national academic institutions, NGOs, the government of Jordan and international and regional environmental organizations including UNDP, UNEP and IUCN. Mr Wardam is currently working with UNDP as a project manager for the third national communication report on climate change in Jordan.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to No protected areas please, we are in the “Arab Spring”!

  1. انا بدعوك استاذ واردم لزيارة محمية اليرموك الطبيعية لعمل تقرير مصور عن محمية اليرموك من خلال الالتقاء مع عدد من ابناء المجتمع المحلي للوقوف على عدة حقائق بالنسبة لمحمية اليرموك ولترى انجازات المحمية على ارض الواقع وبكرر شكري الجزيل على كتاباتك الرائعة واسلوبك الراقي في هذا المجال
    محمد ملكاوي / منسق برنامج الاتصال والتنمية المحلية في محمية اليرموك

  2. السيد باتر الصديق الذي احترم
    ولكنك في هذه المقالة تبخس المجتمعات المحلية حقهم وتحكم عليهم دون سند وتدعم بكل قوة إدعاءات الجمعية الملكية لحماية الطبيعة وفي التنمية الاجتماعية الاقتصادية التي يكذبه النموذج الذي طالما تغنت به الجمعية الملكية لحماية الطبيعة وهو محمية ضانا فستجد هناك كم هي حصة المنطقة من التنمية وحجم التنمية الذي قدمته الجمعية لملكية لحماية الطبيعة بعد حوالي 25 سنة من “التنمية الاقتصادية الاجتماعية” راجيا أن تسمح لي باستخدام علامات التنصيص -كما فعلت- للتقليل من الأهمية وعدم القناعة بما بين التنصيص.
    الجمعية الملكية تدعي دائما دورها العظيم ورئيسها انيس المعشر (الذي افضى لما افضى اليه) وعد بخمسمائة فرصة عمل خلال خمسة سنوات من عمر الجمعية ، إلا أننا وحتى الآن بعد 25 سنة لم نصل الى خمس ذلك الرقم…
    أرجو التكرم بتوخي الدقة والتعرف على احتياجات المجتمع المحلي والاستماع له قبل أن تقرر تنصيص “الادعاءات التاريخية ”
    كل الاحترام
    خالد الخوالدة

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s